Ethical Non-Monogamy: Is the Impact Worth It?

In this engaging video, Dr. Joe Beam and CEO Kimberly Beam Holmes of Marital relationship Assistant explore (ENM), analyzing its implications and how it intersects with ideas like polygamy and recommendations to polygamy in the Bible. They explore the meaning, questioning if personal consent suffices to justify its practice in the middle of potential psychological harm and social interruption.

The discussion critically assesses the effect of ENM on emotional connections, trust, and the essence of satisfying relationships, challenging the trend of focusing on personal desires over deep, dedicated bonds. This discussion is an invite to review the real value of exclusivity and intimacy in relationships, advocating for a return to monogamous dedications as the structure for individual and societal wellness.

Join us for a thought-provoking expedition of ethical non-monogamy, its difficulties, and the pursuit of genuine connection in today's complex relationship landscapes.

Time Stamps:
0:00 – Ethical non-monogamy in a relationship.
1:21 – Ethical non-monogamy and its effect on relationships.
5:03 – The importance of comprehending sexual relationships.
11:09 – Monogamy, polygamy, and scriptural teachings.
17:43 – Monogamy and intimacy in marital relationship.

Want 25% off your first month of your Save My Marital relationship membership?
Click the link and use code "YOUTUBE" at checkout!
.

Marital Relationship Assistant Couples Workshop – Over 70% Success Rate:.

#EthicalNonMonogamy #MarriageAdvice #OpenMarriage.

Ethical Non-Monogamy: Is the Impact Worth It?

Save My Marriage
Save My Marriage Today!

You May Also Like

About the Author: Renee Love

14 Comments

  1. OK. I had direct experiences about ethical polyamory, not a little knowledge from researches and/or prejudices. Your talk is only on surface level knowledge of topic and (sorry) but full whit monogamous and neo-protestante prejudices. Firstly, ethical non-monogamy and ethical polyamory are umbrella words. Those mean not a simple and same ideology/signification. The word ethical is real ethical, because the partners know each other and accept each other. I some cases help to each other. The most disgusting thing, when monogamous people judging the ethical non-monogamy, but have secret affairs. Second: the ethical polyamory is not “legalized limerence lovership”. OR: that might be that, or MIGHT BE NOT THAT. But not that is all cases. This is a typical monogamous prejudice against ethical polyamory. My secondary or third partner is not necessary my “public lover”. So: you monogamous people have a hugh logical trick. Non-monogamous relationships follow not binary logic, but you judge them through binary logic. Yes/No, Real/Fals etc. People can love different people in same time. And that would be TRUE LOVE. Sorry. The main problem whit ethical polyamory/non-monogamy is not this. The question is equivalent whit the question of Communism. The Communism failed in Soviet Union. OK. But the Communism was wrong? Absolutely not. Communism and ethical non-monogamy have same roots. Please read the state of family from Friedrich Engels. Monogamy looks to a partner as a property. This man is mine, that woman is mine. This is a real HARM for mankind. Ethical polyamory and ethical non-monogamy is a priori wrong? It depends on. There are open questions.

    1. ​@@pm71241
      The principles are applicable even if you are not a believer!

      Our laws and morals are going down the drain because different people want different things and/or outcomes and different groups of people want different things and/or outcomes. There is no level base for right and wrong. Many individuals in today’s world can be hard saying, “I do what’s right for ME”, in essence making their own rules. If each person wants to follow their OWN rules, it can only result in chaos because those rules often don’t match the laws of our land!

  2. I don’t mean this in an insulting way, but in the literal meaning of the word: This talk is based on ignorance.
    You simply don’t know what you’re talking about.
    First of all. You can’t generalize. “Ethical non-monogamy” is an umbrella term and there’s a huge difference between “open marriage”, “polyamory” and “swinging”.
    From personal experience, I only have experience with swinging and it is explicitly based on trust, open communication and affection for your partner and if those things are in place in advance, it can really strengthen a relationship.

  3. I have to doubt that the reasonfir your position is because you’re “about true love”.
    It sounds more like it because you have religious prejudice about something you know nothing about.

    1. No, YOU have prejudice because you just don’t want to have morals and rules. Even WITHOUT religion or God as a level base for morals and rules, there must be something wholesome to base all these things on. Otherwise everyone is saying and doing, “what is right for me”, and to heck with rules and LAWS.

      CHAOS

  4. That’s why our laws and morals are going down the drain.

    When different people want different things and/or outcomes and different groups of people want different things and/or outcomes, there is no level base for right and wrong. Many individuals in today’s world can be hard saying, “I do what’s right for ME”, in essence making their own rules. If each person wants to follow their OWN rules, it can only result in chaos because those rules often don’t match the laws of our land!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *